Ian Fleming: The Man With the Golden Gun

16 Tasks of the Festive Season: Square 14 – Dies Natalis Solis Invicti

Brief Rendezvous with Mr. Bond

 

In the discussions inspired by Broken Tune’s reads of Hugh Fraser’s Rina Walker books a comparison with Ian Fleming’s James Bond novels came up — I thought before I embark on Fraser’s novels myself (if I do) I ought to at least briefly dip into Fleming’s, though going by appearances it strikes me that there is probably a case to be made that the better comparison piece would be the Bond movies, not the actual novels.

Anyway, I’m not planning to embark on a run-through of the entire Bond canon — I have no doubt that there is plenty of sameness both in the approach and the storylines (not to mention racial and sexist stereotypes), so if I’d done that instead of short-cutting to this, the last novel of the original Bond series, I’d probably be worn out and bored to tears at this point. Not having done that, I could actually enjoy the story as a thriller, not to be taken too seriously (and not looking too closely at the obvious plot holes, most notably the question why Bond, having run into his quarry in a Jamaican brothel fairly early on, doesn’t take him out immediately — he has NO sort of watching or investigating brief, after all; he’s supposed to kill the man outright.  Or, for that matter, why Scaramaga, circumspect arch-villain that he is, would ever decide to take on a man about whom he knows nothing whatsoever as a temporary security guard.  But then, of course, we wouldn’t have the pleasure of visiting that hotel, meeting the scoundrel’s latest business associates, and embarking on that luxury train ride out into the country …).

My enjoyment of this book was immeasurably enhanced by having it read to me by Kenneth Branagh — he is one of those people to whom I’d listen reciting the phone book, and quite frankly the fact that he was reading this book was one of the reasons why I picked it for my brief dip into 007 waters in the first place.  Without Mr. Branagh’s narration, this would have been somewhere in the 3 or 3 1/2 star range — but he managed to add a whole different level to it, and for this he earns the whole package a healthy racking up of its star rating.

Since the bulk of the story takes place in swelteringly hot and sunny Jamaica, I also got to complete my read for square 14 of the 16 Festive Tasks that way — Dies Natalis Solis Invicti.

 

Original post:
ThemisAthena.booklikes.com/post/1618519/16-tasks-of-the-festive-season-square-14-dies-natalis-solis-invicti-brief-rendezvous-with-mr-bond

0 thoughts on “Ian Fleming: The Man With the Golden Gun

    1. He is one heck of a narrator (well, and actor, obviously). — Are you going to watch the new „Orient Express“? For all his versatility, that‘s one role I‘m skeptical about… he just doesn‘t have the right body for Poirot IMHO.

      1. Somehow I totally missed your comment. Apologies and in case the answer is still relevant: I watched it and enjoyed it. It never felt like he was trying to imitate any of the previous Poirots, he found his own way to tell the story and interpret the character and so I could just watch it without getting too caught up in comparing him to any other version (or my own image of him). If that makes sense XD

    1. I really enjoyed it but it didn’t change too much of the original story. Most were small changes to the biographies of the characters (e.g. because Penelope Cruz would not have been the most convincing Swedish missionary :D). And yes they also added an unnecessary action-scene at the end and a rather drawn-out (but amusing) intro but that didn’t bother me too much.
      And it simply looks gorgeous. Not just the costumes/scenery. Pretty much every frame made me go ‘This would make a beautiful painting’

      1. Oh, I believe that it *looks* gorgeous, sight unseen! But.why hire Cruz if she didn‘t match the character profile as actually written? Hmmm — still not sure about this.

        1. You might not enjoy the movie then 😀 I don’t mind these changes as long as the plot-important bits stay the same (e.g. the countess is still Russian so the part with the handkerchief still works). But if those changes annoy you, the whole movie might not be for you since there were quite a few of these small changes.

Leave a Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Literature Reviews Uncategorized

J.R.R. Tolkien: The Hobbit – Performed by Andy Serkis

Like its magnificent sequel, The Hobbit is, I think, many things to many people: the first exposition of the universe that would become Middle-earth; prelude to The Lord of the Rings; a bite-sized visit to Middle-earth whenever you don’t feel up to the full blow of the War of the Ring(s); one of the most […]

Read More
Literature Reviews

Karen Wynn Fonstad: The Atlas of Tolkien’s Middle-Earth

Blurb: “Find your way through every part of J.R.R. Tolkien’s great creation, from the Middle-earth of The Hobbit and The Lord of the Rings to the undying lands of the West … The Atlas of Tolkien’s Middle-earth is an essential guide to the geography of Middle-earth, from its founding in the Elder Days – as […]

Read More
Literature Reviews

J.R.R. Tolkien: The Lord of the Rings – Performed by Andy Serkis

In another online community, we recently talked about the new Andy Serkis Lord of the Rings recordings.  Well, it turns out that the pull of The Ring is still mighty strong, for however much it may have been destroyed in Mount Doom. I had barely gotten my hands on these audios and I found I […]

Read More
%d bloggers like this: